SCAI publishes consensus document about radiation exposure to the pregnant interventional cardiologist and technical staff

313

The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) announced publication of a consensus document concerning radiation exposure to pregnant physicians and technical staff in the cardiac catheterisation lab (cath lab). The paper, titled “SCAI Consensus Document on Occupational Radiation Exposure to the Pregnant Cardiologist and Technical Personnel,” was developed by SCAI’s Women in Innovations (WIN) group and is published in the February issue of SCAI’s peer-reviewed journal Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions.

The complexity of minimally invasive procedures continues to increase, requiring greater fluoroscopy time and increased chance of radiation exposure to medical staff. The paper addresses reservations about the safety of female interventional cardiologists, technicians and nurses exposed to radiation in the cath lab during pregnancy – an issue that many believe has contributed to a disparity in the number of women who practice in the field.

According to the American Association of Medical Colleges women now account for 49% of medical students, yet only 8.7% of female apprentices are enroled in interventional cardiology fellowship programs in the USA. A recent survey found 24% of women name radiation exposure as a reason to alter a career plan in cardiology to a more minimally exposed field. Yet current scientific data, published in the paper, show that fetal radiation exposure in the cath lab is very low and is far lower than limits recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection. Data also show no increased risk for side effects associated with radiation exposure in utero such as childhood cancer, mental retardation, reduced intelligence quotient (IQ) or pregnancy loss.

“Maintaining the safety of our patients and staff is always our number one priority. Radiation exposure is a very legitimate concern in our industry, but standard safety guidelines, protocols and tools have been designed to ensure radiation exposure is kept to a safe minimum in all staff and patients, regardless of gender,” said Patricia J.M. Best, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA and lead author of the consensus paper. “We hope this paper encourages women considering a career in interventional cardiology to review the available scientific data and make an informed career choice. We also encourage institutions to make their radiation safety policies clear to all staff in an effort to ease women’s fears about any occupational exposure they may encounter.”

Even with promising scientific data suggesting no increased risk to the fetus from occupational radiation exposure, the paper reinforces that pregnant physicians, technicians and nurses should take appropriate measures to reduce radiation exposure, including:

 

  • Completing formal education and training in radiation protection
  • Notifying proper institutional radiation safety personnel of pregnancy to ensure adequate monitoring
  • Using lead shields and personal protective equipment, including maternity lead or lead-equivalent protective garments
  • Using a direct reading dosimeter and radiation monitoring badge, worn at the waist level under the lead garment, in addition to the typical radiation monitoring badge worn at the collar

The paper also addresses legal issues surrounding exposure protections, reinforcing that in the United States all exposure protection policies must be applicable to all employees, regardless of age, gender or pregnancy. Still, many institutions enact their own policies prohibiting women from working near radiation after revealing pregnancy. The authors of this paper and SCAI would discourage that practice, as it may prevent women from disclosing their pregnancy status, thus hindering proper monitoring of radiation exposure during pregnancy.

Full content of the paper “SCAI Consensus Document on Occupational Radiation Exposure to the Pregnant Cardiologist and Technical Personnel” is available on http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.22877/pdf